11/11/2022 0 Comments Miller sixtyfour alcohol![]() ![]() § 1332 (West 1993) (providing for subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship) and under 28 U.S.C.A. The district court had subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. ![]() We have appellate jurisdiction over these final orders of the district court. ("Anaconda"), dismissing all of McFarland's claims against them, and denied McFarland's cross-motion for summary judgment as to liability. On those motions, the district court granted summary judgment to appellees Joseph Miller ("Miller") and Anaconda, Inc. Present: HUTCHINSON and ALITO, Circuit Judges, FULLAM, District Judge OPINION OF THE COURT HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.Īppellant Doris McFarland, personal representative of George "Spanky" McFarland ("McFarland"), now deceased, appeals orders of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on cross-motions for summary judgment. t/a Spanky McFarland's, a New Jersey corporation. Reilly (argued) Dowd & Reilly, Red Bank, NJ, for appellees Joseph Miller, an individual, and Anaconda, Inc. Tanick (argued) Mansfield & Tanick, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.īernard M. Garubo, Hochberg, Krieger, Danzig & Garubo, Roseland, NJ, Marshall H. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Joseph MILLER, an individual Andaconda, Inc., t/a Spanky McFarland's, a New Jersey corporation Strawberry Fields, Inc., a New Jersey corporation. 14 F.3d 912 (1994) Doris McFARLAND, in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of George "Spanky" McFarland, Appellant (per Court's 9/21/93 Order) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |